How an artificial tooth monopoly put the DOJ’s blockbuster Apple antitrust suit in New Jersey

Image: The Verge / Getty Images

So, what bash artificial teeth person to bash with the Department of Justice’s monolithic suit against Apple? Well, they whitethorn beryllium 1 of the reasons wherefore the DOJ decided to record its suit successful the authorities of New Jersey — alternatively of, say, Virginia oregon Washington, DC, similar it did for Google and Microsoft.

The DOJ antecedently filed — and won — a akin antitrust lawsuit against a institution that makes fake teeth successful the Third Circuit, which includes New Jersey.

In an interrogation with The Verge, William Kovacic, the erstwhile seat of the Federal Trade Commission and a prof astatine the George Washington University Law School, explains that “the Third Circuit is simply a jurisdiction with immoderate beauteous bully instrumentality for plaintiffs connected monopolization issues.” He points to the DOJ’s 2004 antitrust lawsuit against Dentsply, a dental proviso institution that manufactures fake teeth.

“It was a lawsuit — debased tech — that progressive dentures,” Kovacic says. “But they [the DOJ] won and with an sentiment that lays retired a presumption of the instrumentality that’s going to beryllium bully for them here.”

At the time, the DOJ accused Dentsply of maintaining a monopoly successful the artificial teeth business. Dentsply made and sold artificial teeth to dealers, who past sold them to dental laboratories to marque dentures. But, arsenic outlined successful the lawsuit, Dentsply adopted a argumentation that blocked authorized dealers from adding “further bony lines to their merchandise offering.” This prevented dealers from selling different brands of artificial teeth to laboratories, allowing Dentsply to “exclude competitors from the dealers’ network.”

While a territory tribunal initially ruled successful Dentsply’s favor, the Third Circuit reversed this determination and recovered that the company’s “grip connected its 23 authorized dealers efficaciously choked disconnected the marketplace for artificial teeth, leaving lone a tiny sliver for competitors.” Since the DOJ emerged victorious successful this peculiar case, it whitethorn deliberation it’ll person an vantage against Apple here.

“The [Dentsply] lawsuit focuses precise overmuch connected the effort by the ascendant steadfast to usage exclusive dealing arrangements to forestall rivals from getting inputs they request to succeed,” Kovacic says. “It’s a rule that the DC Circuit accepted and applied successful the Microsoft monopolization case.” The DOJ isn’t hiding the fact that it built overmuch of its lawsuit connected its antitrust suit against Microsoft, either.

Teeth whitethorn not beryllium the only crushed wherefore the DOJ chose a New Jersey District Court arsenic its venue. The Verge besides spoke with California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is 1 of the 16 attorneys wide progressive successful the DOJ’s lawsuit. While Bonta says helium wasn’t heavy progressive successful choosing the venue since the DOJ was mostly successful complaint of that decision, helium does person immoderate knowing of wherefore the DOJ picked New Jersey — and it’s arguably a small little breathtaking than fake teeth.

“I recognize that Samsung is headquartered determination [New Jersey], and they are impacted by the anticompetitive behaviour and exclusionary behaviour of Apple,” Bonta says. The suit lists some Samsung and Google arsenic the 2 “meaningful competitors” to Apple successful the premium smartphone marketplace and specifically points retired that Samsung’s US office are “located successful this district.”

In 1998, the DOJ filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft successful the DC territory court. Its 2020 suit implicit Google Search was besides filed successful DC, and its 2023 suit against Google implicit advertisement tech was filed successful the adjacent eastbound territory of Virginia.

Additional reporting by Lauren Feiner.